Abstract
Although the It is fact that pre-harvest bagging is a straight forward and growers convinced
method which is to be utilizing as important tool to improve significantly the actual
appearance and compound fruit quality although, it is a costly and little bit tedious practice in
large canopy fruit trees which needs enormous scope creation. Although, notwithstanding,
farmers can decrease production expenses and increment efficiency and benefit by over 90%
per hectare. Simultaneously, it is a powerful option in contrast to reduce the cost of utilization
of agrochemicals to control various fungal diseases and insects attacks by reducing the sprays
and compromise the security of laborer’s in the horticulture industry along with health of
consumers. Any food test, particularly natural fruit, is inclined to containing pesticide build-
ups since they are broadly scattered from their application regions. Many examinations have
suggested the utilization of plastic bags in this way, there is a need to create and test
biodegradable bags that break down after use. There is additionally a requirement for future
examination to normalize details for the best kinds of bags to be utilized and to decide the
ideal bagging and debagging plans for growers to benefit from this eco-friendly technology.
Introduction
Among a few decent agrarian practices, pre-harvest fruit bagging is becoming very popular
few nations of the world. It is an actual assurance procedure, which further develops organic
product appearance by advancing natural product tinge and lessening flaws. It carries various
impacts to interior natural product quality. Fruit bagging also reduces disease and bug bother
occurrence, mechanical harm, burn from the sun, natural product breaking, agrochemical
buildups, and harm by birds. Because of such helpful impacts, this GAP has turned into a
necessary piece for peach, apple, pear, grape, and loquat creation in nations like Japan,
Australia, China, and the USA, and certain nations, viz., Mexico, Chile, and Argentina, don’t
1&3 Ph.D. scholar, 2 Associate Professor, and 4 Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Department
of Horticulture, NPG College, Barhalganj, Gorakhpur (UP)
import apples in the event that they are not bagged. Various investigations have been led the
world over to outfit the impacts of organic product stowing on variety and nature of the
produce, and various creators have revealed problematic outcomes, which might be because
of contrasts in the kind of pack utilized, the transformative phase when the organic product is
sacked, the time of openness to normal light after bag removal (before harvesting), and fruit-
and cultivar-specific responses.
During their development and advancement, organic product go through a few physical and chemical changes and are defenseless to bug bother pervasions, bird attack different microorganisms, and mechanical harm, all of which can decrease their business esteem and consequently cause huge yield and economical losses. To prevent the losses caused by biotic and abiotic factors, a few decent farming practices (GAP) are becoming famous all through the World. Moreover, the advancement of elective methods to work on the appearance and nature of products of the soil diminish illness and bug pervasions is turning out to be progressively significant as purchaser tension over the utilization of man-made agro-chemicals and ecological mindfulness increments.
Among a few such other options, pre-harvest fruit bagging has arisen as effective methodology unconcerned regions of the planet. In this strategy, individual natural fruit or Fruit branches are bagged on the tree for a particular period. Bagging is an actual protection method, ordinarily applied to many fruits, which not just works on their visual quality by advancing strip coloration and decreasing the occurrence of fruit cracking and russeting.
Bagging Materials
The materials normally used in the development of fruit bags incorporate Kraft-type paper, baking paper, polyethylene, micro perforated polypropylene, and polypropylene spun bond fabric (PSF) (Abbasiet al., 2014; Bilcket al., 2011; Liu et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2019). Bags are produced in various colors and designs, with a definitive point of improving their appropriateness for fruit production (Muchuiet al., 2010). Not with standing actual assurance, bagging has been utilized to safeguard individual fruit or bunches of fruit from low temperatures, particularly in calm areas (Rajametov, 2017). Bagging has likewise been demonstrated to lessen the pressure of harsh temperatures on fruit in winter, prompting early fruit maturation (Mohamed and Al-Qurashi, 2012; Muchuiet al., 2010).
Temperature
Low temperatures for instance, those under 13°C, can cause strip staining and uneven ripening, particularly in bananas, to such an extent that fruit isn’t adequate to the commodity market (Hailuet al., 2013; Snowden, 2010). Low temperatures may likewise defer development, along these lines expanding the period among blooming and collecting (Hailuet al., 2013; Vargas et al., 2010). To keep away from these impairments, preharvest bagging has been very helpful for the purpose of working on the natural states of fruit to advance their development and improvement. Packing basically changes the light levels, temperature, and stickiness around the enclosed fruit, bringing about different phytochemical changes in the fruit (Guoet al., 2019). Sack materials influence light transmission through the bags to the encased leafy foods influence natural product variety improvement (Santosh et al., 2017). Transparent bags let in more light than clear blue or green. Transparent bags can be covered to hinder bright and infrared radiation (IR). Bags transmit ultraviolet and infra-red radiation work on the light and temperature conditions for fruit development (Muchuiet al., 2010; Santosh et al., 2017).
Micro-climate
Bagging makes a microclimate that keeps a somewhat high temperature around the natural product, in this manner preventing frost damage (Santosh et al., 2017). By and large, by 1 to 2°C in winter and 3 to 6°C in summer (Omar et al., 2014; Santosh et al., 2017). This microclimate can further reduce the bloom period to-gather stretch period by 4 to14 days and increment the fruit or branch weight and length (Omar et al., 2014). By and large, above 95% carbon dioxide (CO2) shifts generally from <1% to 42%, and oxygen (O2) goes from 2% to 19%, which can be diminished by the utilization of punctured bags that likewise for stall contagious illnesses (Muchuiet al., 2010). The size of the openings utilized changes; they can be 12.7mm at time spans, 6mm each 10 cm, or 3 mm or micro perforations, contingent upon the predominant climatic circumstances (Santosh et al., 2017).
The influence of preharvest bagging on fruit quality
The physical appearance of the peels, including its size, shape, variety, sparkle, and independence from defects and rot, is critical in the exceptionally serious commodity requests and a many neighbor hood requests (Islam etal, 2017). In these superb outlets, purchasers bear steady inventories of invariant fruit with fault free peels (Santosh etal, 2017). Incompetence to fulfill these requirements might bring about the insufficiency of request access and performing financial decay (Liu etal, 2015). Along these lines, a many variables impact fruit appearance, including vexation irruption, raspberry assaults, microorganisms, physiological issues, and mechanical detriment, which leave injuries. (Sharma etal, 2014; Zhou etal, 2019). Pest responsible for major financial mischances in fruit production fruit canvases and thrips (Thysanoptera).These pests are known to feed on fruit, in this way causing shrivelling, solidifying, pale yellowing, and sautéing of the strip as well as dragged and patchyscars on the fruit peel.
Fruit maturity and ripening
Preharvest bagging has been taken an important package of practices in the commercial cultivation of fruit crops for upgrading and speeding up development, the growing process and answer the tones of questions, which are also liable for strip variety change like lycopene, carotenoids, and anthocyanin, by further developing the fruit medium during the bagging time frame (Islam etal., 2017; Kayeshetal., 2013). Liu etal. (2015) revealed that pre-harvest bagging exercising with yellow paper and non-oven poly propylene bags, further promote thered colour development and anthocyanin content of peach peel to varied extent than control. Chonhenchobetal. (2011) and Islam etal. (2017) detailed that bagging mango exercising brown and white paper, muslin fabric and frequencies pacific (bright straight forward) plastic bags basically worked on the β-carotene content, which is liable for peel colour.
Fruit colour
Fruit colour tone is a principle mark of fascination for the customers who purchase the products (Purbey and Kumar, 2015). Pre-harvest bagging practice has been taken on to work on the visual nature of fruit by advancing peel coloration (Jakhar and Pathak, 2016). Preharvest bagging advances the light awareness of fruit pigments answerable for peel colour, like chlorophyll, carotenoids, and anthocyanin amalgamation, when fruit are re-presented to light for specific measures of time after bag expulsion, prompting improved coloration (Kim et al., 2010; Purbey and Kumar, 2015; Zhang et al., 2013).
Fruit firmness and weight
The pre-harvest bagging strategy has been utilized at a few formative stages for improving fruit physiology, hence straightforwardly or in a roundabout way adding to the development and size of the product (Sharma and Sanikommu, 2018). Itemized that bagging date palm with dull, white, blue, and yellow plastic sacks truly accelerated normal natural fruit advancement and increment fruit weight, length, and width contrasted and control. Itemized that bagging apples with spun bonded light yellow texture packs on a very basic level superior fruit immo and variety at accumulate and during postharvest amassing of a half year at 2°Ccontrasted and control. Abbasiet al. (2014) showed that bagging guava (Psidiumguajava) using paper bags very effectively further developed fruit steadiness at gather and during postharvest accumulating of 15 days at 15 °C.
Economic impact and cost–benefit ratio of pre-harvest bagging
In the horticulture industry, over portion of the creation volume is affected by natural product fly, among various disturbances. Fruit fly might cause, for instance, fruit damage or frightening, decaying, and defence lessness to microorganisms, which lead to weighty misfortunes of yield and quality. Yield misfortune because of fruit fly harm has been accounted for to be ≈70% for mango and 40% for citrus organic products (Citrus sp.). The expenses of material and work, ecological and wellbeing perils to customers, and constraints to and preclusion of engineered pesticides in natural horticulture, worldwide mindfulness and endeavours for the advancement of nonchemical choices, for example, pre-harvest packing to decrease irritations and infection invasion, are expanding.
Preharvest bagging is one of the best non-chemical choices and subs for pesticides (Liu et al., 2015; Sharma and Sanikommu, 2018). It is monetarily successful on the grounds that it decreases the expense of creation, especially that of organic production of fruit, in this manner expanding the net benefit and simple to-utilize work on, breaking the monetary and instructive hindrances of ranchers, and advancing further development in natural organic fruit (Karajeh, 2018). Study showed that adopters of bagging innovation in mango creation utilizing earthy coloured paper twofold layer bags, white paper single-layer bags, punctured polythene, and muslin fabric bags had essentially more significant returns of 10,850 kg, pre-harvest bagging is a financially suitable procedure for fruits assurance that further develops fruits physical and physiological quality and diminishes or takes out the over the top use of pesticides.
Future prospects
Previous research work on preharvest bagging to improve fruit quality has mostly confined around assessing the quality at harvest although, very few investigations have detailed the impacts of pre-harvest bagging on postharvest natural fruit quality and storability (Kireeti et al., 2016). Hence, future examinations need to be explored the effect of pre-harvest bagging on post-harvest fruit quality.
The utilization of paper bags has additionally been demonstrated to be fit for further developing fruit quality, yet they are inclined to be more chances to be damage by wind and rains, which annihilate the bags, in this way permitting bugs to access and harm the natural product during formative stages (Lin et al., 2012). Not with standing these hardships in the ease of doing bagging process and its associated monetary cost of pre-harvest bagging, So that it has transformed into a huge piece of the business culture in horticulture fruit industry especially for apples, pears, peaches, and loquats in countries like Japan, China, and the United States (Feng et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015). The advantages of pre harvest bagging still need to be advanced universally.
The turn of events and proposal of viable biodegradable bags are required (Islam et al., 2017). Biodegradable bags made of polyolefin plastic absolutely rot in time through the action of regularly happening micro-organisms (Cheong et al., 2010). Totally biodegradable starch-based polymers are promising materials for a few applications, and their improvement may be an effective answer for diminishing the utilization of petrol assets and natural issues (Lu et al., 2009).
References
Lu, D.R., Xiao, C.M. &Xu, S.J. 2009. Starch-based completely biodegradable polymer materials. Express Polym. Lett. 3:366-375.
Cheong, K.S., Balasubramaniam, J.R., Hung, Y.P., Chuong, W.S. & Amartalingam, R. 2010. Development of biodegradable plastic composite blends based on sago derived starch and natural rubber Pertanika J. Sci. Technol. 18:411-420.
Kim, Y.K., Kang, S.S., Cho, K.S. & Jeong, S.B. 2010. Effects of bagging with different pear paper bags on the color of fruit skin and qualities in ‘Manpungbae’ Korean J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 28: 36-40.
Muchui, M.N., Mathooko, F.M., Njoroge, C.K., Kahangi, E.M., Onyango, C.A. & Kimani, E.M. 2010. Effect of perforated blue polyethylene bunch covers on selected postharvest quality parameters of tissue-cultured bananas (Musa spp.) cv. Williams in central Kenya. J. Stored Prod. Postharvest Res. 1:29-41.
Snowden, A.L. 2010.A colour atlas of postharvest disease and disorders of fruits and vegetables. General introductions and fruits. Manson Publ., London, UK
Vargas, A., Valle, H. & González, M. 2010. Effect of colour and density of polyethylene bunch covers on the dimensions, appearance and postharvest quality of banana and plantain fruits.Agron. Costarric. 34: 269-285.
Bilck, A.P., Roberto, S.R., Grossmann, M.V.E. & Yamashita, F. 2011. Efficacy of some biodegradable films as pre-harvest covering material for guava. Scientia Hort. 130: 341-343.
Chonhenchob, V., Kamhangwong, D., Kruenate, J., Khongrat, K., Tangchantra, N., Wichai, U. & Singh, S.P. 2011. Preharvest bagging with wavelength-selective materials enhances development and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Nam Dok Mai #4. J. Sci. Food Agr. 91: 664-671.
Lin, J., Wang, J.H., Li, X.J. & Chang, Y.H. 2012. Effects of bagging twice and room temperature storage on quality of ‘Cuiguan’ pear fruit. Acta Hort. 934: 837-840.
Mohamed, A.A. & Al-Qurashi, A.D. 2012. Gibberellic acid spray and bunch bagging increase bunch weight and improve fruit quality of ‘Barhee’ date palm cultivar under hot arid conditions. Scientia Hort. 138:96-100.
Hailu, M., Workneh, T.S. &Belew, D. 2013. Review on postharvest technology of banana fruit. African. J. Biotechnol. 12:635-647.
Kayesh, E., Shangguan, L., Korir, N.K., Sun, X., Bilkish, N., Zhang, Y., Han, J., Song, C., Cheng, Z.M. & Fang, J. 2013. Fruit skin color and the role of anthocyanin. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35: 2879-2890.
Zhang, X.J., Wang, L.X., Liu, Y.L., Chen, X.X., Yang, Y.Z. & Zhao, Z.Y. 2013. Differenial gene expression analysis of ‘Granny Smith’ apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) during fruit skin coloration. S. Afr. J. Bot. 88:125-131.
Abbasi, N.A., Chaudhary, M.A., Ali, M.I., Hussain, A. & Ali, I. 2014 on tree fruit bagging influences quality of guava harvested at different maturity stages during summer. Intl.J. Agr. Biol. 16: 543-549.
Feng, F., Li, M., Ma, F. & Cheng, L. 2014. The effects of bagging and debagging on external fruit quality, metabolites and the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in ‘Jonagold’ apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Scientia Hort. 165:123-131.
Omar, A.E.D.K., Al-Saif, A.M. & Ahmed, M.A.E.A. 2014. Bagging of bunches with different materials influences yield and quality of Rothana date palm fruit. J. Food Agr. Environ. 12: 520-522.
Sharma, R.R., Reddy, S.V.R. &Jhalegar, M.J. 2014. Pre-harvest fruit bagging: A useful approach for plant protection and improved post-harvest fruit quality – A review J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 89:101-113.
Purbey, S.K. & Kumar, A. 2015. Effect of pre-harvest bagging on quality and yield of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) fruits. The Ecoscan: Intl. Quarterly J. Environ. Sci. 7:197-201.
Liu, T., Song, S., Yuan, Y., Wu, D., Chen, M., Sun, Q., Zhang, B., Xu, C. & Chen, K. 2015. Improved peach peel colour development by fruit bagging. Enhanced expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic and regulatory genes using white non-woven polypropylene as replacement for yellow paper. Scientia Hort. 184:142-148.
Jakhar, M.S. & Pathak, S. 2016. Effect of pre-harvest nutrients application and bagging on quality and shelf life of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits cv. Amrapali. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 18: 717-729
Kireeti, A., Haldankar, P.M., Babu, M.R.V. & Parulekar, Y.R. 2016 Effect of pre harvest bagging on mango fruit quality.Res. Environ. Life Sci. 9:1366-1369.
Islam, M.T., Shamsuzzoha, M., Rahman, M.S., Haque, M.M & Alom, R. 2017. Influence of pre-harvest bagging on fruit quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Mallika. J. Bios. Agr. Res. 15:1246-1254.
Rajametov, S. 2017. Effect of paper bag types on fruit physiology and quality of pear cv. ‘Packham’s Triumph’ during harvest and storage period.Genet. Plant Physiol. 7:89- 104.
Santosh, D.T., Tiwari, K.N. & Reddy, R.G. 2017. Banana bunch covers for quality banana production – A review. Intl. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 6:1275-1291.
Karajeh, M.R. 2018. Pre-harvest bagging of grape clusters as a non-chemical physical control measure against certain pests and diseases of grapevines. Org. Agr. 8:259-264.
Sharma, R.R. & Sanikommu, V.R. 2018. Pre-harvest fruit bagging for better protection and postharvest quality of horticultural produce, p. 455–489. In: M.W. Siddiqui (Eds.). Preharvest modulation of postharvest fruit and vegetable quality.
Guo, S.H., Xu, T.F., Shi, T.C., Jin, X.Q., Feng, M.X., Zhao, X.H., Zhang, Z.W. and Meng, J.F. 2019. Cluster bagging promotes melatonin biosynthesis in the berry skins of Vitisvinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and Carignan during development and ripening.Food Chem. 305: 1-9.
Zhou, H., Yu, Z. & Ye, Z. 2019. Effect of bagging duration on peach fruit peel colour and key protein changes based on iTRAQ quantization. Scientia Hort. 246:217-226.